<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trade policy and the food crisis: conflicting views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/trade-policy-and-the-food-crisis-conflicting-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/trade-policy-and-the-food-crisis-conflicting-views/</link>
	<description>"Before you've finished your breakfast this morning, you'll have relied on half the world." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/trade-policy-and-the-food-crisis-conflicting-views/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I wrote an article recently (I may try to get it in a student paper in September) about fair trade. I was trying to point out, as you have been saying, that the concept is more complex than a lot of people seem to think. I didn&#039;t take sides for or against fair trade, but it should be scrutinised a bit more thoroughly. It&#039;s too easy to see it as some kind of panacea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article recently (I may try to get it in a student paper in September) about fair trade. I was trying to point out, as you have been saying, that the concept is more complex than a lot of people seem to think. I didn&#8217;t take sides for or against fair trade, but it should be scrutinised a bit more thoroughly. It&#8217;s too easy to see it as some kind of panacea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/trade-policy-and-the-food-crisis-conflicting-views/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davostoseattle.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-2</guid>
		<description>A rather worrying thought occurs to me whilst reading these last few posts regarding my foremost conviction that Fair Trade is a good idea. I am not an economist--as I am sure will be apparent--however I assume that it is uncontentious that whilst actual food loss in terms of failed crops and shortfalls exacerbate the present &#039;Food Crisis&#039; the leading cause is that, in order to maximize their ability to feed themselves and their own dependents, merchants in &#039;poor&#039; countries would rather sell to purchasers in &#039;rich&#039; countries from whom they can obtain a higher price.

How then does the idea of Fair Trade fit into this?

What should &#039;rich&#039; countries pay for produce from &#039;poor&#039; areas of the globe in order to ensure that: 

A. We do not exacerbate the &#039;crisis&#039; further by buying at a higher price outbidding locals, 

and B. We do not screw third world traders over by offering prices artificially low--so that locals can compete and resources stay in the area--helping to promote local poverty.


It seems that global fair trade could only support economies in &#039;poor countries&#039; if people in them were not themselves consumers; otherwise it could lead to the draining of resources from that area, leading to problems such as the &#039;present&#039; &#039;food crisis&#039;.

May be we advocates of fair trade should really think hard about of what  calculating a &#039;fair price&#039; is constituted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rather worrying thought occurs to me whilst reading these last few posts regarding my foremost conviction that Fair Trade is a good idea. I am not an economist&#8211;as I am sure will be apparent&#8211;however I assume that it is uncontentious that whilst actual food loss in terms of failed crops and shortfalls exacerbate the present &#8216;Food Crisis&#8217; the leading cause is that, in order to maximize their ability to feed themselves and their own dependents, merchants in &#8216;poor&#8217; countries would rather sell to purchasers in &#8216;rich&#8217; countries from whom they can obtain a higher price.</p>
<p>How then does the idea of Fair Trade fit into this?</p>
<p>What should &#8216;rich&#8217; countries pay for produce from &#8216;poor&#8217; areas of the globe in order to ensure that: </p>
<p>A. We do not exacerbate the &#8216;crisis&#8217; further by buying at a higher price outbidding locals, </p>
<p>and B. We do not screw third world traders over by offering prices artificially low&#8211;so that locals can compete and resources stay in the area&#8211;helping to promote local poverty.</p>
<p>It seems that global fair trade could only support economies in &#8216;poor countries&#8217; if people in them were not themselves consumers; otherwise it could lead to the draining of resources from that area, leading to problems such as the &#8216;present&#8217; &#8216;food crisis&#8217;.</p>
<p>May be we advocates of fair trade should really think hard about of what  calculating a &#8216;fair price&#8217; is constituted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
